Fine Art America - Buy Art and Sell Art Online
Artist Websites

Fine Art America unveils the world's most powerful

artist websites.

Every purchase includes a money-back guarantee.

312-238-9009

Every Day   |   9 AM - 9 PM

CART

JOIN  |  LOGIN

Sell Art Online

Fine Art Discussions

Keyword Search  | Main Menu

Search Discussions

 

Woman Who Botched Spanish Fresco Wants Royalties

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/20/2012 - 11:53 PM

 

Oldest Reply

Posted by: Mario Donk on 09/21/2012 - 12:14 AM

World has gone mad

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 12:16 AM

'gone'? That's a constant ;)

 

Posted by: Ed Meredith on 09/21/2012 - 12:24 AM

HAHAhaha ha ha ha haaa aaa

 

Posted by: Angelina Vick on 09/21/2012 - 12:31 AM

=)

Dan Tuner should get a kick out of that. The crazy lady gets a lawyer to sue for money on the painting she destroyed,
and a church is getting a lawyer because she destroyed the painting.

There are so many ironies in there...where to begin...

 

Posted by: Rebecca Sherman on 09/21/2012 - 12:55 AM

From the article:
"The church decided to charge a one-euro admission fee for visitors, collecting about 2,000 euros in four days, which prompted the woman’s family to seek royalties for the work."

Her *family* is seeking the royalties. She is an 80 year old woman who made an epic mistake.

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 12:57 AM

An epic event, in any case.

 

Posted by: Christine Till on 09/21/2012 - 1:36 AM


How silly!

 

Posted by: Jean Moore on 09/21/2012 - 1:41 AM

Rather than sue for Royalties, they could just go in and take a picture and then sell the photos as a derivative work. They would certainly make more $ that way.

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 1:48 AM

Silly sells ;) Any bets they're already planning on photo shoots with the artist with her -- ah -- resurrection?

If not the actual piece -- her rendition of it....wait for it. There'll be mugs, IPhone cases, Behold The Monkey digipainting apps & all kind of groovy souvenirs. The rabble like that.

 

Posted by: Gregory Scott on 09/21/2012 - 1:48 AM

An interesting legal issue is here. Can you copyright a stolen or otherwise illegal work? Should you financially benefit from a felonious act of vandalism, and senile bad judgement?

This seems like an opportunity for the legal owner of the vandalized work to recoup some of their lost assets. It seem intuitive to me that the true owner of the original painting should get all benefit and rights that can be salvaged from the situation.

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 1:50 AM

Seniors' homes want to know.

 

Posted by: Mo T on 09/21/2012 - 5:50 AM

There's a polish idiom "Boze ty to widzisz i nie grzmisz..."- "God You see this and You're not thunder"...

 

Posted by: Shana Rowe on 09/21/2012 - 6:19 AM

This is crazy!! Just when I thought this situation couldn't get any stranger!!!! lol

 

Posted by: Abbie Shores on 09/21/2012 - 7:37 AM

Banksy was just a graffiti artist who defaced other peoples property and is now one of the most famous artists of the 20th-21st century

Who is to say she will not become the same :)

 

Posted by: Johnny Trippick on 09/21/2012 - 7:40 AM

A quick visit to Poundland to stock up on my supplies of bargain basement acrylics and Kelvingrove Art Gallery here I come.

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 10:13 AM

Johnny -- you made my morning -- as Ed said above "HAHAhaha ha ha ha haaa aaa"

Another epic in the making ;)

 

Posted by: Peter Jai on 09/21/2012 - 10:13 AM

all I see is 30,000 people bored out of their skulls not knowing what to do with their time

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 10:17 AM

Gives them something to do apparently -- different strokes ...

Speaking of time -- back to other focus ;)

 

Posted by: Mike Savad on 09/21/2012 - 10:53 AM

that's insane. first off no security lets the lady do what she wants. still not sure why she painted over the face since it wasn't really damaged. the church charging admission. now she wants money, nice. i suppose she could copyright the image, but it's a little late now, and it was never her image. and she should be sued, however it will be mixed up in court considering the amount of money the church is making from it. makes it kind of confusing. i still wonder if she thinks she's an artist.


---Mike Savad

 

Posted by: Mike Jeffries on 09/21/2012 - 11:02 AM

Best of luck to her I say, wish I'd thought of it. Surely the Church who lost no time exploiting the situation could pay her a royalty fee for her trouble, they are after all one of the richest institutions on the planet.

 

Posted by: Mary Ellen Mueller-Legault on 09/21/2012 - 11:02 AM

and on the next day, God created stupidity!

(I mean the situation, not these opinions, of course!)

 

Posted by: Rose Santuci-Sofranko on 09/21/2012 - 11:35 AM

Un...freaking...believable!

 

Posted by: Carmen Hathaway on 09/21/2012 - 12:07 PM

That's it Mary Ellen -- the epic has spawned a terrific tsunami of "oh my gawd!"s

Completely believable & utterly entertaining.

Next. ;) (epic, that is -- there's always another -- often eclipsing the previous.)

 

This discussion is closed.